Wednesday, August 26, 2020

The Schlieffen Plan :: European Europe History

The Schlieffen Plan The point of the arrangement The point of the arrangement was to abstain from battling two wars on the double (France and Russia) The Plan The arrangement was to assault France, not on the principle outskirt, which was strengthened, however to assault through Belgium and circle the capital Paris. This is completely expected to occur before the anticipated a month and a half it would take for the Russians to prepare their military for activity. This would mean Paris would be taken by Germany, hence catching France, at that point the soldiers could go the nation over and assault Russia. What really occurred: * Germans went into Belgium * Belgians exploded railroads which halted Germans * Belgians halted supplies and fortifications getting to the Germans * Britain needed to join war since Germany was assaulting France and Belgium * Sir Edward Gray made parliament battle, he said 'on the off chance that we don't battle Germany will rule Europe and exchange will endure' * British government sent a message to advise Germans to leave Belgium * No answer to the message * Britain was at war with Germany * Everyone in all the nations were hurrying to join the military, they thought their nation was correct and they would win * 100,000 officers from the BEFC (British Expeditionary Force) arrived in France * more than 1,000,000 French officer were prepared to utilize plan seventeen to assault Alasce and Lorraine * following 3 weeks everything turned out badly * German soldiers drove into France * Russians activated more rapidly than anticipated, and attacked * troops were taken from France to protect on the eastern front * French and German fighter met at the waterway Marne * All the French and English soldiers went to protect on the waterway Marne, the skirmish of the Marne started For what reason did it fall flat? The Schlieffen plan fizzled for some reasons. The excursion however Belgium didn't go as the Germans needed. They got eased back down in light of the fact that the Belgian armed force set up a battle. This implied the German soldiers were 10 days late. The Germans needed to get the war over with France so they didn't need to battle Russia simultaneously, so when they got postponed, they were in a tough situation. On the 29th august, Von Cluck (German general) changed the arrangement, so they didn't assault Paris as arranged, rather they went east and sent more soldiers to assault the strongholds.

Saturday, August 22, 2020

Analysis on Gender Discrimination Free Essays

Do you ever ask why your folks never make your sister cut the grass or perhaps on the off chance that you are a female, your folks naturally make you wash dishes? Mothers get their girl†s ears pierced at age two yet won't let their children get their ears pierced until they are out of the house. What gives? These are instances of how choices depend on whether you are male or female, also called sexual orientation predisposition. In light of their sex, individuals don't land positions they are very much equipped for, are paid lower compensation, and are neglected for work advancements and numerous different chances. We will compose a custom exposition test on Investigation on Gender Discrimination or then again any comparable point just for you Request Now Sex segregation is surrounding us; you can discover it all over the place. Sexual orientation separation is a progressing issue in the Fox Valley, the territory of Wisconsin, and the United States. Samantha Miller and Mark Dagostino report a case of this separation at Boston College. They clarify that for as long as a quarter century, Mary Daly, 70, has banned men from her classes, demanding that her female understudies learn better without male interruptions. â€Å"The purpose of my group is that there be where ladies can make our contemplations and our own way of thinking, unhampered by male centric invasions,† Daly expressed. â€Å"It†s not about separation at all.† Boston College as of late terminated Daly when she dismissed the school†s final offer to concede men after a male understudy took steps to sue the school asserting Daly was abusing government law. Boston College authorities keep up Daly†s position disregarded the milestone 1972 Title IX enactment that bars sex segregation at schools accepting government reserves (1). She may have valid justifications for needing an all-female class, yet the law states everyone is qualified for an equivalent open door for training. Sexual orientation separation goes back similar to Adam and Eve. Would you be able to envision the world beginning with a lady in charge? As sexual orientation segregation kept on attacking all parts of life, the administration started to step in. Laws were passed so ladies could cast a ballot and become open authorities. President Richard M. Nixon marked Title IX of the Federal Education Law in 1972 that prohibited sexual orientation separation in classes. Barbara Bitters reports there are schools in Wisconsin that are not agreeing to the law since they despite everything have separate boys† and girls† ensembles. Little Chute High School, a little network situated in northeastern Wisconsin, has a women†s† ensemble. Is it accurate to say that they are in consistence? Jean Beschta, an Appleton secondary school direction guide, recalls when the law was passed in the seventies. â€Å"There were a great deal of anxious dads who were stressed what might befall their young men in the event that somebody acquainted them with cookbooks, plans, and dish towels.† Some of Wisconsin†s notable universities are likewise doing combating with sexual orientation inclination. Julie Sneider from the Business Journal Serving Greater Milwaukee revealed an investigation done in 1998 that shows just twenty-five percent of Marquette†s full-time residency track staff are ladies, and just six of the school†s one hundred and fourteen employees with full teacher status are ladies. The central government has condemned UW-Madison for not bringing the quantity of female personnel closer to the quantity of female understudies who establish the greater part of the understudy body. Gwen Carleton from the Capital Times reports some portion of the issue is that a large number of the senior members and executives settling on employing choices keep on accepting ladies are unfit or uninterested in staff positions. How are we getting along as a country? The Capital Times, refers to an investigation discharged by the AFL-CIO, showing that Wisconsin is among the most noticeably awful states for a sexual orientation pay hole among all day laborers. â€Å"Across the country, ladies procure 74 pennies for each dollar earned by men. An ordinary lady in Wisconsin wins 69 pennies for each man†s dollar, or $193 less per week,† (1). The U.S. President Bill Clinton stated, â€Å"Equal pay is anything but a policy centered issue. It isn't so much as a sexual orientation issue. It is, on the most fundamental level, a national issue, a family issue, and a matter of head †an issue of what sort of nation we need America to be today, and in the twenty-first century,† (Zadrozmy). In the event that our own leader thinks equivalent compensation among both genders isn†t a political issue, whose issue right? Sexual orientation predisposition is seen at all levels yet without the help of laws to implement fairness between the genders, what should be possible? Every one of us as people needs to do our part. Vote to keep government officials in office that favor balance for people in all parts of their lives †equivalent work opportunity, equivalent rights to decent instruction, equivalent compensation for a similar activity, etc. Bolster schools that offer equivalent open doors for their instructors and understudies paying little mind to their sexual orientation. Show your kids to keep receptive outlooks and not judge individuals and their capacities by whether they are male or female. In particular, base your choices without letting inclination meddle with your result. The most effective method to refer to Analysis on Gender Discrimination, Papers

Tuesday, August 11, 2020

How to Negotiate a Better Grade

How to Negotiate a Better Grade The Secret to Negotiating a Better Mark With Your Professors The Secret to Negotiating a Better Mark With Your Professors There will be times throughout your university career when negotiating a better mark is something you will feel obligated to do. Professors, and the TAs that often mark papers for them, are only human, and stress, time demands, apathy, even bias can show in the way they mark your work. You might have written what you felt was the best paper of your life, and spent night after night putting together something you considered your best work when you turned it in, only to get back a disappointing grade. Negotiating a better mark is always an option While your professors are certainly highly educated, and are intimately familiar with the subject matter you are being asked to write about, their mark, at the end of the day, is still their subjective evaluation of your work. If you receive a paper, or a written essay back with a grade you feel is not representative of the quality of the work, it pays to know how to negotiate a better mark with your professors. Here’s how: Be specific Before walking into your professor’s office hours, or sending off an email, make sure you’ve made a solid case that goes into specific detail. While you may think it is unfair to have received a low mark on something you put so much time into, that, in itself, is not a justification for receiving anything more than you’ve already been given. You have to be able to point to what you see as flaws in the marking. Go through your paper with a fine-tooth comb. Read each comment and cross-reference it with the essay rubric/marking criteria. If marks have been deducted for failing to do something not mentioned in the rubric, make a note of it. If marks have been deducted for using a word the professor didn’t like, or for which they suggested a synonym, that’s a personal preference, and you shouldn’t be penalized for not sharing it with your professor. Typically, you will just receive a mark and that’s it. You are paying good money for an education, and should receive (and you should demand it if you don’t) a thorough breakdown of what you did wrong, where and why you lost marks, and thoughtful written criticism from the marker. If you ever receive a number or a letter on a piece of paper with no elaboration, and don’t like what you see, you should be asking whoever marked it to justify the mark they gave you straight away. Never negotiate angry or come in arrogant “You must have your heart on fire, and your brain on ice,” Vladimir Lenin said, and it is a good rule of thumb for any negotiation. It is essential you be, and appear passionate about what you believe in, but it is equally essential you don’t allow emotions to override your critical faculties. If your professor sees that you are passionate about the material, and about what you wrote, they will be more receptive to your arguments than if you appear simply, and glibly to be after a few unearned percentage points. They will not, however, be receptive if you come in with accusations, or are arrogant. In fact, one of the most important ‘donts’ of any negotiation where you are after more of something (money, recognition, a higher mark, etc.) is don’t be arrogant. Arrogance makes it seem like you’re entitled to a better grade than you got. While you might be deserving of more, negotiating a better mark is going to be impossible if your professor doesn’t like you. Remember, he or she is not obligated to give you anything. In no part of the fine print on anything you’ve signed as a university student does it say your professors are to give you grades that make you happy. Don’t make your negotiation a presentation Negotiating a better mark should be a two-sided conversation, not a lecture or a presentation. Don’t come in with a speech prepared, come in with a list of points you plan to argue and wait for an opportunity to interject. It is also not a good idea to ambush your professor or TA. If you are scheduling an in-office meeting, let whomever you are going to be speaking with know what your intentions are: you’re coming to talk about a mark you received. Be professional. You should treat asking for a better grade as you would asking for more money. You want to convince the professor that your work is undervalued and you deserve more for it. Tell them you want to respond to each one of their comments individually. Point to a comment, speak your piece, and then continue on. If your prof or TA sees that your responses are thoughtful and fair, you might not get all the extra marks you were hoping to get, but you may get some which is better than nothing. Don’t be a sore loser Not every negotiation is going to go in your favour. You might sit down with your professor and end up realizing the mark they gave you was justified. Maybe you wrote a compelling, top-notch paper, but it failed to answer the essay question directly. Maybe you were asked to comply with some basic formatting requirements, but, in your excitement, forgot to do so. In the event that your professor’s defense of their marking makes more sense than your request for a reconsideration, don’t assume your professor is your enemy. Don’t be rude, don’t leave in a huff, don’t make it seem like you are a spoiled child who can’t take their criticism. Thank your professor for their time, tell them you will tweak your writing on the next project, and wish them a nice day. Chances are if you come off fair and reasonable, you are much more likely to get a more receptive, more lenient marker the next time around, and you will have conserved a relationship you may need to call on at some point for a reference letter, for an extension on a project, etc. Sometimes people (your professors included) are just difficult and impossible to please. If you find you are consistently falling short of the results you would like, and negotiating a better mark isn’t an option, contact Homework Help Global and let one of our professional academic writers give your writing the boost to take it to the next level. References: Florentine, S. (2018). “The Dos and Don’ts of Negotiating a Raise.” CIO. Retrieved from: Lenin, V. (2018). “You must have your heart on fire and your brain on ice.” AZ Quotes. Retrieved from: 769836 How to Negotiate a Better Grade The Secret to Negotiating a Better Mark With Your Professors The Secret to Negotiating a Better Mark With Your Professors There will be times throughout your university career when negotiating a better mark is something you will feel obligated to do. Professors, and the TAs that often mark papers for them, are only human, and stress, time demands, apathy, even bias can show in the way they mark your work. You might have written what you felt was the best paper of your life, and spent night after night putting together something you considered your best work when you turned it in, only to get back a disappointing grade. Negotiating a better mark is always an option While your professors are certainly highly educated, and are intimately familiar with the subject matter you are being asked to write about, their mark, at the end of the day, is still their subjective evaluation of your work. If you receive a paper, or a written essay back with a grade you feel is not representative of the quality of the work, it pays to know how to negotiate a better mark with your professors. Here’s how: Be specific Before walking into your professor’s office hours, or sending off an email, make sure you’ve made a solid case that goes into specific detail. While you may think it is unfair to have received a low mark on something you put so much time into, that, in itself, is not a justification for receiving anything more than you’ve already been given. You have to be able to point to what you see as flaws in the marking. Go through your paper with a fine-tooth comb. Read each comment and cross-reference it with the essay rubric/marking criteria. If marks have been deducted for failing to do something not mentioned in the rubric, make a note of it. If marks have been deducted for using a word the professor didn’t like, or for which they suggested a synonym, that’s a personal preference, and you shouldn’t be penalized for not sharing it with your professor. Typically, you will just receive a mark and that’s it. You are paying good money for an education, and should receive (and you should demand it if you don’t) a thorough breakdown of what you did wrong, where and why you lost marks, and thoughtful written criticism from the marker. If you ever receive a number or a letter on a piece of paper with no elaboration, and don’t like what you see, you should be asking whoever marked it to justify the mark they gave you straight away. Never negotiate angry or come in arrogant “You must have your heart on fire, and your brain on ice,” Vladimir Lenin said, and it is a good rule of thumb for any negotiation. It is essential you be, and appear passionate about what you believe in, but it is equally essential you don’t allow emotions to override your critical faculties. If your professor sees that you are passionate about the material, and about what you wrote, they will be more receptive to your arguments than if you appear simply, and glibly to be after a few unearned percentage points. They will not, however, be receptive if you come in with accusations, or are arrogant. In fact, one of the most important ‘donts’ of any negotiation where you are after more of something (money, recognition, a higher mark, etc.) is don’t be arrogant. Arrogance makes it seem like you’re entitled to a better grade than you got. While you might be deserving of more, negotiating a better mark is going to be impossible if your professor doesn’t like you. Remember, he or she is not obligated to give you anything. In no part of the fine print on anything you’ve signed as a university student does it say your professors are to give you grades that make you happy. Don’t make your negotiation a presentation Negotiating a better mark should be a two-sided conversation, not a lecture or a presentation. Don’t come in with a speech prepared, come in with a list of points you plan to argue and wait for an opportunity to interject. It is also not a good idea to ambush your professor or TA. If you are scheduling an in-office meeting, let whomever you are going to be speaking with know what your intentions are: you’re coming to talk about a mark you received. Be professional. You should treat asking for a better grade as you would asking for more money. You want to convince the professor that your work is undervalued and you deserve more for it. Tell them you want to respond to each one of their comments individually. Point to a comment, speak your piece, and then continue on. If your prof or TA sees that your responses are thoughtful and fair, you might not get all the extra marks you were hoping to get, but you may get some which is better than nothing. Don’t be a sore loser Not every negotiation is going to go in your favour. You might sit down with your professor and end up realizing the mark they gave you was justified. Maybe you wrote a compelling, top-notch paper, but it failed to answer the essay question directly. Maybe you were asked to comply with some basic formatting requirements, but, in your excitement, forgot to do so. In the event that your professor’s defense of their marking makes more sense than your request for a reconsideration, don’t assume your professor is your enemy. Don’t be rude, don’t leave in a huff, don’t make it seem like you are a spoiled child who can’t take their criticism. Thank your professor for their time, tell them you will tweak your writing on the next project, and wish them a nice day. Chances are if you come off fair and reasonable, you are much more likely to get a more receptive, more lenient marker the next time around, and you will have conserved a relationship you may need to call on at some point for a reference letter, for an extension on a project, etc. Sometimes people (your professors included) are just difficult and impossible to please. If you find you are consistently falling short of the results you would like, and negotiating a better mark isn’t an option, contact Homework Help Global and let one of our professional academic writers give your writing the boost to take it to the next level. References: Florentine, S. (2018). “The Dos and Don’ts of Negotiating a Raise.” CIO. Retrieved from: Lenin, V. (2018). “You must have your heart on fire and your brain on ice.” AZ Quotes. Retrieved from: 769836

Saturday, May 23, 2020

The Fourth Amendment In The Bill Of Rights - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 3 Words: 794 Downloads: 6 Date added: 2019/07/31 Category Law Essay Level High school Topics: Bill Of Right Essay Did you like this example? The Fourth Amendment in the Bill of Rights was ratified on December 15, 1791. This Amendment protects people from the police searching their homes and private property without a properly executed search warrant. The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized (Annenberg Classroom, 2011). Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "The Fourth Amendment In The Bill Of Rights" essay for you Create order The Fourth Amendment protects people against unreasonable searches and seizures by government officials. A search can mean everything from a frisking by a police officer to a blood test to a search of an individuals home or car. A seizure occurs when the government takes control of an individual or something in his or her possession. Items that are seized often are used as evidence when the individual is charged with a crime (Annenberg Classroom, 2011). This amendment is meant for agents of the government, it does not apply to people who do not belong to the government. The Fourth Amendment imposes certain limitations on police investigating a crime and prevents the use of illegally obtained evidence at trial. But it does not restrict all searches. For example, courts have ruled that school officials may search school lockers and require that students who participate in extracurricular activities undergo random drug testing (Annenberg Classroom, 2011). This amendment gives people a right to privacy. This amendment can be bypassed by police if they have a reasonable cause to search, which is typically when people feel like their rights are being violated. To social workers, this amendment can have various degrees of importance depending on where they work. If the social worker works at the Department of Human Resources, they must abide by the Fourth Amendment, they cannot search any of their clients without a warrant or reasonable cause. If a social worker works in a nursing home, they have to abide by a different set of rules when it comes to searching which is called Residents Rights which is put in place and enforced by the Ombudsmans Office. In both cases clients and residents alike have their right to privacy protected. I found the Third Amendment the most surprising. I did not realize that the people of the United States needed to have rights written down stating that soldiers could not come into their homes without permission of the owner. The drafters of the Constitution, like many other colonists, were resentful of laws, in place before the Revolutionary War, that allowed British soldiers to take over private homes for their own use. Thus, the amendment bars the government from forcing individuals to provide lodging to soldiers in their homes, except during war when the interest of national security may override an individuals right of private property (Annenberg Classroom, 2011). Importance of Documents in U.S. History The Declaration of Independence is the document that formalized and made evident colonists intent to disassociate from the British crown and to develop an independent nation state. In effect, its the document that got the ball rolling on establishing an independent, democratic nation. With respect to its importance today, I think it mostly serves to provide historical context and understanding in that it provides a tangible document that we can point to and say this is when things got serious. Otherwise its not a functional document- no laws are made or not made, based on it.   The Constitution is absolutely everything. It lays the entire foundation of the U.S.s entire government framework by establishing three branches, each having clearly defined governmental roles and duties and each of which provides some level of check on the other branches. Its practical purpose today is pretty much the same as its always been, it sets defines the meets and bounds of each branchs power and any attempt by one branch to grab more power the other branches must not be inconsistent with the Constitution.   The Bill of Rights is the first ten amendments of the Constitution and is therefore a component if the Constitution. This is where free speech, rights against unreasonable search and seizures, the establishment clause, etc. Is created. No law or regulation that is found to violate the Bill of Rights can stay in effect. This is the part of the Constitution that established the pillars of a lot of civil rights. References Fourth Amendment. (2011, March 07). Retrieved June 14, 2018, from https://www.annenbergclassroom.org/page/fourth-amendment The Annenberg Guide to the United States Constitution. (2011, March 02). Retrieved June 14, 2018, from https://www.annenbergclassroom.org/page/a-guide-to-the-united-states-constitution Third Amendment. (2011, March 07). Retrieved June 14, 2018, from https://www.annenbergclassroom.org/page/third-amendment

Tuesday, May 12, 2020

Jetblue Strategic Management - 785 Words

Industry Profile: Market Size: Approximately $95 billion Market growth rate: Domestic 2.9%, International 5.0% (forecasted to 2017) Stage in life cycle: mature for domestic, growth for international Number of companies in industry: 43 mainline carriers and 79 regional airlines Scope of competitive rivalry: primarily major carriers (revenue more than $1 billion). Legacy carriers developing low-cost offshoots Customers: 661 million domestic passengers. Expected growth in business customers Degree of vertical integration: mixed; some have low cost reservation systems, alliances with regional and international airlines as well as hotels. Hedged fuel costs. Sabre Holdings and Galileo International connect airlines with travel agents. No†¦show more content†¦Service – simple to use reservation system, ticketless travel, pre-flight conveniences, pre-assigned seating, leather seats and extra leg room, free DIRECTV service and complimentary snacks and ‘comfort kits’. JetBlue customer Bill of Rights Core competencies Valuable Rare Inimitable Organised to take advantage Collective knowledge base Extendable to multiple markets Competitive Implications Unique Organisational Culture †¢ †¢ †¢ †¢ †¢ †¢ SCA Customer service †¢ †¢ †¢ †¢ †¢ †¢ SCA Marketing Strategy †¢ †¢ ïÆ' » TCA Flight and Hotel packages †¢ †¢ ïÆ' » TCA Reservation system †¢ †¢ ïÆ' » TCA Cost management †¢ †¢ ïÆ' » TCA Low Price †¢ ïÆ' » CP Scale of Economy ïÆ' » CD SCA –Sustained competitive advantage TCA – Temporary competitive advantage CP – Competitive parity CD – Competitive disadvantage Strategic considerations: 1. Declining Profits == Though having began as a very profitable organisation, JetBlue has produced a financial loss for the last two years of the case study. == Growth of current liabilities. == Lacklustre profitability for shareholders 2. Response of legacy airlines == The introduction of competitive, low-cost carriers by the large legacy airlines 3. Reconstruction of its organisational culture == As the company grows its flat organisational structure will have to develop to handle the chain of command as well as continue a 4. Two kinds of airplane == While Southwest (who continue to make a profit) insist onShow MoreRelatedStrategic Management Case Analysis For Jetblue. Daniel’S:1482 Words   |  6 PagesStrategic Management Case Analysis for JetBlue Daniel’s: Introduction Founder David Neeleman, in February 1999, announced plans for a new airline under the name NewAir. In April of the same year, NewAir places an order for 75 new A320 aircraft with Airbus Industry, and leasing arrangements for another eight aircraft. This approach was in line with other domestic airlines for low-cost air travel, but he wanted it be unique in its services. These services included in-flight entertainment, such asRead MoreInformation Resource Management week 1 Essay859 Words   |  4 Pagesinformation systems. Which types of ISs can gain strategic advantage and which cannot? Why? Transaction Processing systems are merely used for recording transactions and thus are not used for gaining strategic advantage. Customer Relationship Management systems can be used to improve customer service quality, thus making it a key strategic advantage tool. Supply Chain Management systems (or Enterprise Resource Planning systems) are used to gain strategic advantage because these are involved in allRead MoreEssay on Information Technology812 Words   |  4 Pagesdiscussion of different types of information systems. Which types of ISs can gain strategic advantage and which cannot? Why? Maximizing sales and lowering costs are two strategies in information systems that help gain strategic advantage because it helps to maximize its strength and results in a competitive advantage. 3. What should an information system achieve for an organization in order to be considered a strategic information system? An information system that takes a certain amount ofRead MoreJetblue - Strategic Analysis1721 Words   |  7 PagesStrategic Analysis Of JetBlue Airways Executive Summary This report on JetBlue identifies how they have become an innovator in the airline industry by targeting customers who value a low-cost, customer conscious airline. They have formulated strategies that have enabled them to operate in a highly efficient and effective manner while realizing the importance of aligning their strategies with their environment. The report thoroughly discusses the strengths and weaknesses that the companyRead MoreStrategy As A Position For The Airline Industry2295 Words   |  10 Pagesairline industry has one of the highest barriers to entry, due to associated investment needed and high competition. For a newcomer, a unique position in relation to the competitive environment has to be established to gain foothold in the market. For JetBlue, their unique position was low-cost and high-frill offerings (Brennan Morgan, 2007). Strategy as a Perspective JetBlue’s success in the early 2000s from founder David Neeleman’s visions for a better airline. He brought a new perspective to the traditionalRead MoreStrategic Corporate Communication in Vodacom2673 Words   |  11 PagesABSTRACT Strategic Corporate Communication is communication that happens in a corporation e.g. business, company, shop or group of companies. It is about laying a plan to reach the intended objectives of the company. Let say if the company needs to make profits it should have its strategic plan to reach that goal. On the other hand, those strategic plans must involve internal and external public. Mainly Strategic Corporate Communication is supported by a detailed research plan. CorporateRead MoreDelta Airlines2336 Words   |  10 PagesSituation Synopsis: Margins in air industry have been shrinking for decades. Low Cost Carriers (LCCs) such as JetBlue and Southeast have made inroads to Delta’s Florida market which stands for 30% of Delta’s revenues. After 911 Attacks, the demand decreased. DeltaExpress, Delta’s low-cost subsidiary, is launched to respond LCCs threat but it is not as successful as it was thought it would be. Delta’s current Strategy: Delta mainline is a legacy airline and competes utilizing its low priceRead MoreCase Questions1966 Words   |  8 PagesManagement Strategy Case Questions Case 5: Panera Bread Company 1. What is Panera Bread’s strategy? Which of the four generic competitive strategies discussed in Chapter 3 most closely fit the competitive approach that Panera Bread is taking? What specific kind of competitive advantage is Panera bread trying to achieve? 2. What does a SWOT analysis of Panera Bread reveal about the overall attractiveness of its situation? Does the company have any core competencies or distinctive competenciesRead MoreMarketing Planning4057 Words   |  17 Pages|TERM PAPER – MARKETING PLANNING | |MKTG 6120 MARKETING MANAGEMENT | |INSTRUCTOR : ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR DR. WAN JAMALIAH WAN JUSOH | | | | | | Read MoreSOUTHWEST AIRLINES STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT CASE STUDY Essay7716 Words   |  31 PagesSTRATEGIC MANAGEMENT CASE STUDY SOUTHWEST AIRLINES SÃÅ"LEYMAN SÄ °NAN Ãâ€"ZTÃÅ"RK EBS 5103 STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT INSTRUCTOR: DR. AHMET BEÅžKESE BAHÇEÅžEHÄ °R UNIVERSITY May 2013 Contents CONTENTS ................................................................................................................................... 2 INTRODUCTION: ......................................................................................................................... 3 THE HISTORY: ..........

Wednesday, May 6, 2020

Ezekias Is Considered One of the Finest Painters Free Essays

Ezekias was an ancient Greek vase-painter and potter, who worked between approximately 550 BC – 525 BC at Athens. Ezekias worked mainly with a technique called black-figure; Ezekias is considered the most original and most detail-orientated painter and potter using the black-figure technique. To determine whether Ezekias was the best black-figure artist of all time, we have to first consider the other black figure artists that are among the best, and compare the work of Ezekias to them. We will write a custom essay sample on Ezekias Is Considered One of the Finest Painters or any similar topic only for you Order Now From this, one can then determine an opinion over whether or not Ezekias was the best, or just among the best. Other fine black-figure artists include the Amasis Painter, Sophilos, the Gorgon Painter and Kleitias. Ezekias mainly illustrates historical writings and shockingly realistic interpretations of Athenian life. The styles of the vases appears noticeably different from eight century BC Geometric art featuring abstract motifs and instead show human portrayals that appear to emerge from the painting. A painter of heroes, Ezekias demonstrates his careful attention to detail and insight into Greek mythology with his most famous work: the amphora vase at the Vatican showing Achilles and Ajax playing a dice game. Unlike earlier Athenian black-figure vases of Kleitias the surface of the vase is not divided into horizontal bands; rather, monumental figures are shown in profile view in a single large framed panel. When comparing Ezekias’s amphora to other works of art of the period, it is clear that the artist is working towards finding a freer world. Where there was rigidity in the forms, there is now a mix of sternness and charm. He appears much less interested in violent action than previous and focuses more in soft deliberate movements and small though not insignificant activities that last for some time and reflect a realistic view of Athenian life. The details and decorations of the clothes on the amphora with Achilles and Ajax are engraved with particular care. This is evident in details such as the pattern on the heroes’ cloak, highlighted with delicate touches of white. The figural and ornamental motifs that are characteristic of the black-figure vase painting brilliantly stand out against the red clay background. The arch formed by the backs of the two warriors reflects the shape of the amphora. This shape is echoed throughout the piece, appearing again in the space between the heads and spears of the two men. Unlike some other painters of the time, Ezekias has planned his vase well and therefore had no problem in fitting his characters onto the ase without making them seem out of proportion, which several painters seemed to have a problem with, such as the Gorgon painter on the Dinos where some of the figures protrude into the frieze line. The Attic black-figure style appears to be well-developed, with figures being rendered in a mature archaic style much influenced by contemporary developments in sculpture from the Geometric and Orientalization period. Ezekias excels in painting and in finely engraved detail, and succeeds where others have failed , in endowing his figures with mood and emotion, as well as the capacity for action. How to cite Ezekias Is Considered One of the Finest Painters, Essay examples

Sunday, May 3, 2020

Information Communication Skills Samples †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Information Communication Skills. Answer: Reflective writing In academic processes, assessment completion is a task that cannot be avoided. The main reason why assessment and assignments are important is because they are guiding criterion on how academic capabilities are measured. Academic capabilities are used worldwide to measure individual capability in executing a certain task. Having this knowledge sometimes makes students devote most of their time in studies. Though every students put a lot of effort to achieve the best in completing any academic task, presenting the task in the right manner is a substantial challenge that faces many students. During presentation of Assessment 2 COIT20249 in Term 2, 2017, it was not an easy task to come up with the right format to present my assessment in an orderly manner which could be used to convey my message clearly. To communicate effectively, there is need to for students to choose the correct and required format that makes communication simple and clear. Since every academic task given to scholar s has a learning objective, during presentation of the subject task, it is important to demonstrate some objectives of the study if not all of them, as presented in the course material by the lecturer. Collecting and presenting these learning outcomes in a clear and concise manner did not seem simple as I expected. Personally, experience presented a significant challenge but going through the desired presented activities in the study provided solution. I examined studies deeply in order to help in solving the challenges that I was going through. Reflecting on the journey of the student, it became evident that, every academic challenge can be solved by undertaking a rigorous academic research with relevant materials. Previously, I was not certain about how to handle such academic challenges but once I solved it by undertaking required research and references, I found it simple and easy to communicate my objective of the study. In future, I would not expect to go through the same challenge again because past experience that I underwent while presenting the assessment provided good experience for future basis. It is obvious that, I may not do it in a similar manner again because my experience would help in handling the rest of my future presentations in a simple and logical manner. Lastly, the bes t experience I gained is on taking personal research successfully. It was quite satisfying to get it done without assistance from friends. The worst part of it was the study efforts required and time consuming activity to present the task so that communication is achieved in a precise manner. Responding to an Ethical Scenario Working conditions are quite different from academic works and it would be wrong to focus it on personal gains rather than societal gains. Having discovered this is an opportunity that I should use to solve my future problem. In such a scenario, going to the public or telling it to colleagues may not be the best option. According to ACS professional code of conduct and code of ethics, privacy and secrecy of information obtained should be governed by required principles in IT professionalism (Gross-Schaefer etal., 2000). Though it seems unfair that my colleagues and I work exceptionally hard while unqualified students benefits with scholarship, its presentation ought to be governed by professional code of conduct. The first step is to evaluate about how unsuccessful students benefited with scholarship while coming up with the best alternative such as reporting it to my supervisor in order to get valuable advice. After presenting it to the supervisor, since I am just practicing and I e xpect to continue serving organization in my capacity so that I can get required skills, I should keep it confidential matter to be used in solving similar future problems facing students. Having unearthed this problem, it is important to press my supervisor to find an appropriate solution. Since my supervisor is tasked with organizational database management, raising such an issue would not be a major problem because it will be within duty capacity. The main reason why I would tell my manager is to help in evaluating why such decision was reached leaving out deserving students. Reporting this issue to top level management would ensure appropriate actions are taken to avoid similar cases in future. Similarly, this helps to encourage my supervisor to be a resourceful manager who should carry out database audit early enough in order to help in preventing undeserving students from benefiting in unfair way. In this regard, I would have would have executed my duties by following proper communication channel while upholding the ACS professional code of conduct in IT field (Melvin, 2012). In my opinion, being a practicing employee does not exclude me from disclosing problems I discover while in my line of duty. Despite being a temporary employee, practicing ACS code of conduct would mean I had fulfilled my duty by applying them in accordance to the principle of privacy. Successful Completion of COIT20249 It was quite interesting to have taken this unit as it equips me with various skills. Taking this unit helped me to understand myself better. It presents clearly how to interact with other people while in my line of duty and at a personal level. Interpersonal skills will help student in gaining and enhancing skills relevant to communication at personal level and in relation to professional code of regulations. As an IT professional, I understand this unit has been of benefit by introducing the required ACS code of conduct and professional values that IT professional should possess. Team work was a key factor that as a student I gained by demonstrating how organizational employees should uphold required practices while executing their duties. Being able to present activities both in written format and verbal means has helped to build by communication skills and abilities as required. In regard to professional code of conduct required in IT field, this unit equipped me with skills to u phold principles of IT such as secrecy and privacy of data. According to Australia working guiding practices in IT field, information privacy and all principles related to IT field should be held secret by all employees irrespective of position in the workplace. With proper practices such as frequent data audit and using proper IT professional practices, organizational malpractices can be eliminated. Upholding to the rule of law helps organization information safe and secure. Making use of collaboration tools such as common email in the work place where employees can discuss issues makes it easy to execute organizational duty in a clear manner. In this unit, the most important aspect that I gained included the importance of clear presentation in verbal and written information. Initially, it was very difficult for me to present my ideas either in written or verbal means. After completing this unit, I feel well equipped with skills and knowledge on how to improve my communication skills and present my written work effectively. Despite all these aspect through which I embrace this unit, there are some improvements that could be included in the unit. First, this unit need to implement practical aspect of the study rather than emphasizing on theoretical aspect of the study. This would make the unit more interesting and attractive to students. Lastly, the unit need to be split into two aspects; theoretical aspect while in class which should then be complemented with practical aspect initiated by subject department. References Gross-Schaefer, A., Trigilio, J., Negus, J., Ro, C. S. (2000). Ethics education in the workplace: An effective tool to combat employee theft. Journal of Business Ethics, 26(2), 89-100. Melvin, C. S. (2012). Professional compassion fatigue: what is the true cost of nurses caring for the dying? International Journal of Palliative Nursing, 18(12), 606-611.